Open Letter.
Culver, Ind., Feb. 20.
Editor Nearpass:
The influence for good or evil of a newspaper being far-reaching in shaping public sentiment,
its publication should be preceded by careful examination for facts and the exercise of material
judgment, especially where personality is involved. “ Tell the truth” should be the motto and rule
governing newspapers as it should be for individuals.
Haste should be used only in ascertaining the truth and avoided lest an untruth be published. Truth
told on improper occasions is liable to result in injury, hence propriety is one of truth's safeguards
The pen, as well as the tongue, is an unruly member” sometimes and though it is said to be “ mightier
than the sword”, it is at times libelous as the tongue it slanderous and as dangerous as the sword
is deadly.
Newspapers, as individuals, should not “jump to conclusions, nor gossip nor quote from unreliable
authority or sources.
I am dealing in generalities merely and do not mean this as a castigation, as from a teacher, nor as a
lesson in journalistic ethics, nor as the law to govern the press, presuming nor assuming myself as one
high up in authority along these lines, but I am writing as au humble man in self defense against the
possible effect of your article in the Herald, in which, among other allusions and alter perfuming them
with a laudatory reference, you said—“has, we understand, left Culver for good.”
I keenly appreciate that the words, “ left Culver for good,” expressed the hope and the heart’s fondest
wish of a certain Mediantish set ho don't live over a thousand miles from here.
Your article most certainly did give publicity to en erroneous impression, which impression had been put
in circulation by that omnipresent class who infect, and infest decent communities, and feast on the
rankest gossip as a “ sweet morsel" This omnipresent class are the scavenger cart that goes around and
gathers up the gossip of the town and stirs up the stench that sickens the moral sensibility of the
community and be smirches the character of their betters.
It is true I “ left Culver for good - but not for the kind of “good” the people thought and the article
expressed, but for my own personal good—to get sober and I succeeded too —praise the Lord. I left Culver
for good, this wise —“If I go away, I will come again” and not because of an impelling or compelling
cause, nor did my leaving mean that I had “gone else where" as the Metropolitan paper of Plymouth put
it, in its introduction to the publication of your article.
It is plain to be seen of all men, that I am here in the lush in answer to your inquiry.
“Oh, where, oh, where is Kirk I” I am somewhat- of a surprise box—sometimes you open me expecting to
find something and find nothing, then again you open me expecting to find nothing and find something I
have rented a nice, comfortable office in the Mender block. and it is likely this will compel some to
take Mrs. Winslow's “Soothing Syrup.” or a prescription for “heart failure” Empires crumble,
municipalities surrender, and dynasties fall, but I never crumble, never surrender, never go under; nor
have I ever fallen—in character and manliness only when I have set aside the value of character end the
sell respect and dignity of manliness to indulge in intoxicating liquors. While I have thus indulged to
my sorrow, injury, and now sufficiency, some are now seeking to use my indulgence as a club with which
to slay me, and throw up their hands in holy horror at drunkenness (which would be a credit to them over
the knavish practices of which they are guilty ) while they, “ under cover’ carry on peculations against
the unfortunate. the ignorant and the credulous. The drunkard is seen o f all men, but the present day
Pharohs [Pharaohs], Herods and Judases keep sober and enslave, murder and betray in the dark, where evil
deeds are wont to be done I am not sitting on the “stool of repentance” while writing this, nor moved
by a “ quickened conscience,’’ but am sitting am in sober reflection and moved by an honest heart and
the right of self defense. In conclusion, “the attorney, temperance lecturer and sometimes preacher”
intimates that his return is not likely to be the only surprise to occur to some people.
My return need not have been a surprise and was not only to those who hoped I would not.
My absence was not that of a fugitive, and my return is that of a citizen and my stay will be until I
voluntarily go away as I voluntary came, notwithstanding the “conspiracy”' to “ hypnotize” and “ hammer”
me out of existence. ‘ ‘Let him who is without sin. first cast a stone." I apprehend there will be no
“stones cast” for they are of no value in these regions, as no man has such use for even one.
I hope you will be as liberal with this letter as you was with the “rumor'’—publish in full as an act
of justice, though have written at length. - - V P. Kirk